Input Parameters

Test cases:
Note: These flags affect urgency/prioritization ONLY. They do NOT change transport physics or baseline risk classification.

Screening Results

(unnamed case)
Set inputs and click Evaluate to run screening

Conceptual Transport Schematic

Run Evaluate to populate schematic

📖 How to Use This Tool (and When Not To)

What this tool is designed to do

  • Support early-stage screening of potential subsurface contaminant transport in Phase I assessments
  • Evaluate multiple contaminant groups independently at the same source location
  • Help prioritize sites and pathways for further investigation
  • Provide transparent, deterministic reasoning for screening outcomes

What this tool does NOT do

  • Does NOT calculate contaminant concentrations or mass flux
  • Does NOT model time-to-impact or plume evolution
  • Does NOT perform quantitative vapour intrusion modeling — VI-relevant scenarios are flagged for separate assessment
  • Does NOT model transport in fractured rock or bedrock
  • Does NOT replace site-specific numerical models or substitute professional judgment
Professional Disclaimer: All results must be interpreted by qualified environmental professionals. Final decisions require site-specific investigation and professional judgment.

🔒 Model Spec (Locked Lookup Tables)

These values define the deterministic behavior of the screening tool. Fixed and locked.
Scope: Clastic sediment profiles only (soil, fill, alluvial/colluvial clay–sand–gravel sequences). Fractured rock and bedrock are outside model scope. Where bedrock is encountered, the clastic column above defines the assessed profile.
Multi-contaminant logic: Each selected contaminant group is evaluated independently. Overall risk = highest risk class across all groups. Driver = contaminant with highest risk class; ties broken by highest mobility class, then highest source strength score. This rule is deterministic and contaminant-neutral. Significant disagreement (≥2 risk levels apart) is flagged in results.

Surface Cover → Infiltration Score

CoverScore
Concrete−7
Asphalt−3
Compacted soil−2
Open soil0
Unknown−2

Soil Texture → Infiltration Score

TextureScore
Sand+1
Sandy loam / Clayey sand0
Clay−1
Unknown0

Slope → Modifier

SlopeModifier
<5°0
5–15°−1
>15°−2
Unknown−1

Horizontal Distance to Receptor → Connectivity

DistanceConnectivityNotes
<10 mHIGHNear-field — direct exposure plausible
10–30 mMEDIUMRealistic impact under most GW conditions
30–75 mLOWAttenuation significant — impact conditional on site factors
75–250 mVERY_LOWImpact only under high-velocity, high-source conditions
>250 mVERY_LOWSame class as 75–250 m — bin retained for site representation accuracy
UnknownMEDIUMConservative default
Note: 75–250 m and >250 m both map to VERY_LOW. The distinction is preserved so users can accurately represent their site geometry — it does not affect model output.

Source Type

TypeStrengthDefinition
PointHIGHDiscrete, mappable release
AreaMEDIUMDistributed over a delineable zone
UnknownMEDIUMDefault conservative

Contaminant Group → Mobility

GroupMobilityNotes
VOCHIGHVI flag triggered for shallow sources + shallow foundation
PFASHIGHSoil barrier penalised; mobility scored. Persistence and regulatory sensitivity (ng/L) are not scored — flagged as professional interpretation factors for Phase II scoping.
SVOC / PetroleumMEDIUMPetroleum treated as generalized TPH / LNAPL behavior (near-source non-aqueous phase + dissolved GW). DNAPL-phase behavior is outside this tool's scope and is not modelled.
MetalsLOWSorption-limited
Mixed / UnknownMEDIUMPrecautionary default

Source Magnitude / Confidence

OptionMaps toUse when
High (confirmed)HIGHMajor release, significant exceedances
Moderate (confirmed)MEDIUMConfirmed release, moderate concentrations
Trace / incidentalLOWMinor confirmed release
Suspected (land use only)LOWLand use implies risk, no confirmed release. More informative than Unknown.
UnknownMEDIUMNo data — precautionary data-gap default

Release Age → Source Strength Modifier

AgeModifierRationale
Recent (<10 yr)+1High mass flux, limited attenuation time
Established (10–30 yr)0Neutral
Legacy (>30 yr)−1Potential partial attenuation
Unknown0No adjustment; counted in uncertainty

VI Flag Trigger

VOC or Mixed contaminant group AND source depth = Surface or Shallow AND foundation = Shallow. Does not affect baseline risk. Indicates a separate VI assessment (soil vapour / indoor air) should be scoped in Phase II.

Basement VI Consideration Trigger

VOC or Mixed contaminant group AND source depth = Surface or Shallow AND foundation = Deep AND distance ≤30 m AND receptor present = Yes. Warning only — does not affect transport score, baseline risk, or overall risk. Intended to flag possible basement / sub-slab vapour pathway for separate assessment. Structurally exclusive with the VI Flag Trigger (which requires Shallow foundation).

Risk Baseline Logic (Priority Order)

Derived from transport class and source strength only. No proximity, regulatory, or screening heuristics at this layer.
RuleConditionOutcome
Transport GateBoth V & H ≤ LOWLOW (MEDIUM if magnitude=High confirmed)
High TransportCombined = HIGHHIGH
High Source + High PathwaySource=HIGH & (V or H=HIGH)HIGH
High Source + Medium TransportSource=HIGH & Combined=MEDIUMMEDIUM
Low EnvelopeOne MEDIUM, other ≤LOW, source≠HIGHLOW
Low SourceSource=LOW & Combined=MEDIUMLOW
DefaultAll other combinationsMEDIUM

Post-Baseline Escalations & Guardrails

Applied after baseline risk is determined. Each rule is input-driven and independent of the baseline output. These are deterministic screening decisions, not transport physics.
RuleConditionEffectRationale
Proximity EscalationSource=HIGH & Combined=MEDIUM & distance ≤30 mRaise to HIGHConfirmed large release with demonstrated transport within close proximity — HIGH concern at screening level regardless of individual pathway class
Near-field GuardrailDistance <10 m & source Surface/Shallow & baseline=LOWRaise to MEDIUMDirect contact, vapour, and shallow lateral pathways plausible at this distance — not captured in GW transport scoring
Note: Proximity Escalation takes priority over Near-field Guardrail. Both are shown explicitly in the audit trail and explanation output. The audit trail preserves "Risk Class (physics)" separately from "Overall Risk Class" to maintain transparency.

Urgency Level

ConditionUrgency
GW Protection Zone = Yes OR Regulatory Trigger = YesHIGH
Sensitive Receptor = YesELEVATED
NoneSTANDARD

References / Scientific Basis

This tool applies a deterministic, heuristic screening approach informed by established contaminated land and vapour intrusion assessment frameworks. It does not implement numerical models or regulatory equations from these sources — the conceptual framework for source-pathway-receptor analysis, transport pathway classification, and vapour intrusion screening is aligned with the guidance listed below. Results require interpretation by a qualified professional with reference to applicable national or regional regulatory guidance.
ReferenceRelevance to this tool
US EPA (2015). Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air.Informs VI flag trigger conditions, basement VI consideration, and vapour pathway screening logic
ITRC (2020). Vapor Intrusion Pathway: A Practical Guideline.Aligned with VI screening distances, exposure pathway classification, and receptor proximity considerations
ITRC (2014). Petroleum Vapor Intrusion: Fundamentals of Screening, Investigation, and Management.Informs petroleum vapour pathway considerations, including vadose zone attenuation
US EPA (2004). User's Guide for Evaluating Subsurface Vapor Intrusion into Buildings (Johnson & Ettinger model documentation).Conceptual basis for vapour attenuation and sub-slab exposure pathway logic
UK Environment Agency (2020). Land Contamination Risk Management (LCRM).Source-pathway-receptor conceptual framework underlying the tool's overall assessment architecture
Freeze, R.A. & Cherry, J.A. (1979). Groundwater. Prentice-Hall.Foundational reference for subsurface transport concepts including advection, dispersion, and vadose zone behavior
Fetter, C.W. (2001). Applied Hydrogeology (4th ed.). Prentice-Hall.Supporting reference for horizontal and vertical transport pathway classification and saturated zone transport

⚠ Disclaimer & Use Conditions

This tool provides a conceptual, deterministic screening assessment only. It supports early-stage professional judgment and does not constitute a formal risk assessment, quantitative analysis, compliance determination, or regulatory submission.

Results are based on simplified lookup tables and pathway scoring. They do not account for site heterogeneity, temporal variability, multi-phase transport, vapour intrusion, or fate-and-transport processes beyond screening-level assumptions.

All results must be interpreted by a qualified environmental professional. The tool authors accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of these screening results.

📎 How to Cite This Tool

If you reference this tool in a report, technical document, or professional communication, use the following citation:

Subsurface Contaminant Screening Tool v2.2 (2026). https://subsurface-screening.netlify.app/

Include the access date in your reference if required by your reporting standard.

💬 Share Feedback

Feedback from practitioners helps improve this tool. You can submit anonymously — name and email are optional.